FanDominion

Get your geek on.
July 24th, 2008

Review: Google’s Knol has intriguing possibilities

<!– {rw_text}

Billed in the tech press as Google's version of Wikipedia, Knol may offer writers of original content a whole lot more.

More control of their material, more freedom and, most importantly, more credit.

{/rw_text} –>

As I write this, I gotta admit that I am a fixture at Wikipedia. I’ve been an administrator there for years and have contributed to thousands of Wikipedia articles either as the original creator or in other fashions.

Within the past 24 hours, I heard that Google had launched its own wiki service called “Knol” (short for Knowledge as in “knol” is a unit of knowlege). Cute and weird – like most things Google.

Now, upon hearing of the Google-owned wiki, I immediately thought Google was launching its own online encyclopedia. So, I went over to check it out.

I was shocked by what I found. Shocked.

CONTROL ISSUES

It turns out Knol is not another Wikipedia. It is much, much more.

Google has been getting the reputation for being a media behemoth. But it sure ain’t acting like one with Knol. The biggest issue that came out and slapped me in the face about Knol is: CONTRIBUTORS KEEP THE COPYRIGHT TO THEIR WORK.

Yes, you read me right. If you contribute something to Knol – you keep the copyright – and may even prohibit other people from altering your work. Ever.

But if you WANT – and only if – you may release the material in a share-and-share-alike method similar to that of Wikipedia. But, that’s just an option – not a mandate.

Their website says:

We respect our users’ ownership of and responsibility for the content they choose to share. It is our belief that censoring this content is contrary to a service that bases itself on freedom of expression.

Unless you run your own site, or contribute to a small site like FanDominion.com – this is unheard of. When you contribute to any other major media site like Wikipedia, Yahoo Answers or even blog on Live Journal, you sign away most – or all – of your rights to your work. But, not so with Knol.

Google wants none of that:

No Google Ownership of User Content.  Google claims no ownership or control over any content submitted, posted or displayed by you on or through the Service. You or a third party licensor, as appropriate, retain all patent, trademark and copyright to any content you submit, post or display on or through the Service and you are responsible for protecting those rights, as appropriate.

The control thing is cool enough – but it gets better.

UNFETTERED CREATIVITY

The next best thing is that Knol does not limit what you can post. You can write about whatever you want (as long as it isn’t hard-core porn, kiddie porn, bestiality or hate speech).

Wanna post your favorite recipe for tuna salad? No problem.

How about an opinionated guide to all 22 episodes of the short-lived 2001 steampunk SCI FI Channel TV series, The Secret Adventures of Jules Verne? Yup.

How about writing a how-to book on creating a fanzine? Yep. Even if someone else has written on the same topic – you can write your own and keep opinionated folks you disagree with from mucking up your take on the issue.

UNCERTAIN LIMITS

Although Google says users should not treat Knol as a blog, the open ended policy does not preclude folks from using Knol to host other forms of writing, such as short fiction, collections of original poems, lyrics, reviews, art galleries, opinion essays, fanzines, and anything else that is not pornography or hate speech.

EASE OF USE

Perhaps the best thing about Knol is how easy Knol is to use. Creating content on the site is literally easier than using many online email services.

And if you already have content written in Word, as a plain text file – or even as a PDF – you can simply upload that file into Knol from your hard drive and with minimal cleaning, you got an article on the web.

I used the service to post a couple of old recipes – and even uploaded some ancient college essays in word format that I had written in many years ago.

Both worked like a dream. You can check out my trial run on Knol by clicking this link. It takes you to my profile page – with a list of my articles appearing on the right hand side of the screen.

Some I even left open for you – or anyone else - to contribute to, while others I did not.

<!– {rw_good}

  • Allows you to keep all copyrights and control of your material
  • Bylines – take credit for what you create
  • Google hosts the content – but does not want to own it
  • Virtually no limits on what you can write about
  • Block others from being able to tamper with your creation

{/rw_good} –>

<!– {rw_bad}

  • For being owned by a search engine, finding content via the resident search function is not easy on Knol
  • Navigation on the site is non-existent aside from “featured knols” which are mostly medical in nature
  • In “beta” which means it is subject to change drastically in the next few months

{/rw_bad} –>

July 17th, 2008

Review of Reviews: Dark Knight a stunning success

<!– {rw_text}

Whether it's run-of-the-mill fanboy attention, rabid Batman fans, or ghoulish gawkers eager to see dead movie star Heath Ledger's final performance, The Dark Knight is set to be one of the biggest blockbuster movies of 2008.

{/rw_text} –>

Dark Knight Movie Poster OPENS: July 18, 2008
RATING: PG-13 (Violence)
GENRE: Superhero, Fantasy

Three years ago independent film maker Christopher Nolan, best known for a little film called Memento, was picked by Warner Bros. to helm and write the big screen return of Batman.

Worse yet, Christian Bale, a British actor was cast in the lead role.

A skeptical but hopeful fanbase was pleasantly surprised when the movie opened as a smart ans serious treatment of the Caped Crusader – not the campy mocking treatment that has been done in past years.

So it was with great anticipation over the past few years that Batman followers looked forward to the release of The Dark Knight, Nolan’s sequel – which had the debut of Nolan’s take on the Joker as played by Oscar nominee Heath Ledger (Roar, A Knight’s Tale, Brokeback Mountain).

Then this past winter the unthinkable happened when Heath Ledger died in an accidental overdose from mixing prescription medications.

Because of this tragedy, The Dark Knight premiere became overshadowed as the last performance of a gifted young actor.

To a one, each mainstream media reviewer – and most fannish reviews – have focused on ledger and his performance. The consensus is that his turn as Joker is a success and exceeds any other actor’s previous attempt to inhabit the iconic role. Many – but not all – predict that Ledger will be nominated for best supporting actor when the Academy Award nominations come out next year.

Also of note, the addition of Maggie Gyllenhaal as Rachel Dawes, replacing Katie Holmes as Rachel Dawes. Most pointed out that Gyllenhaal’s acting chops, easy glamour and commanding screen presence show not only that Holmes was miscast in the role in the first film – but that Gyllenhall, maybe more so than her better-known brother Jake, is destined for a long career in the movies.

Of the few negative comments. Some reviewers didn’t line the 2 1/2 hour length of the film. Others said the film lost the edgy magic of the first film as it reached too far toward becoming an action flick. Still other negative comments focused on the dystopian, bleak atmosphere of Dark Knight.

WATCH THE TRAILER

<!– {rw_good}

  • Outstanding cast
  • Terrific writing
  • Possibly the first superhero movie destined to win in a major Oscar category

{/rw_good} –>

<!– {rw_bad}

  • Not for children because of extreme violence and scary scenes
  • At 2 1/2 hours, may be too long for some people
  • If you want an uplifting feel-good movie, you won’t get it

{/rw_bad} –>

<!– {rw_score}

{for="Houston Chronicle" value="9"}

"Even without the sentimental distinction of being the late actor's last role, Ledger's performance as the Joker is the best thing about the movie." – Eric Harrison

{/for}

{for=”E!” value=”9″}

“It’s almost unfair to call The Dark Knight a sequel. Director Christopher Nolan has crafted a Batman film of such devastating impact, it practically obliterates the memory of its predecessors.” – Alex Markerson

{/for}

{for=”Salt Lake Tribune” value=”9″}

Ledger, tearing into his last great role, embodies the insane genius of The Joker – and of the movie.” – Sean P. Martin

{/for}

{for=”CNN” value=”8″}

In a summer when action overwhelms intelligence (and even good sense), here’s a movie that works on many levels.” – Tom Charity

{/for}

{for=”Washington Post – Family Filmgoer” value=”7″}

“Ledger walks away with the movie. His Joker is insane, evil, scary, funny and even pathetic in his psychopathic lack of feeling. He could give younger kids nightmares. This is not a movie for teens younger than high school age, let alone grade schoolers.” – Jane Horwitz

{/for}

{for=”Newsday” value=”8″}

“Ledger is wickedly brilliant as the Joker. He revels in his spaghetti hair and maimed-clown makeup, but it’s his delightfully nasty delivery and twisted posture that transform him into a force of nature. If Alfred Hitchcock was right that a film is only as good as its villain, that explains the success of The Dark Knight.”- Rafer Guzman

{/for}

{for=”Boston Globe” value=”8″}

“You come away impressed, oppressed, provoked, and beaten down, holding on to Ledger’s squirrelly incandescence as a beacon in the darkness.” – Ty Burr

{/for}

{for=”Chicago Sun-Times” value=”10″}

“Because these actors and others are so powerful, and because the movie does not allow its spectacular special effects to upstage the humans, we’re surprised how deeply the drama affects us.” – Roger Ebert

{/for}

{for=”Salon” value=”6″}

“Looks as if it were made from a messy blackboard diagram with lots of circles, heavily underlined phrases (“Duality! Good vs. evil — in the same person! Kinship between hero and villain!”) and crisscrossing arrows that ultimately point to nothing.” – Stephanie Zacharek

{/for}

{for=”London Free Press” value=”9″}

“this shadowy opus of morality and identity bends the genre to new dimensions — hinging not on spectacle, but the yin-and-yang pathology of its hero and villain. It’s a gripping, gratifying high-wire act and a startling departure for a genre usually dismissed as effects-driven eye-candy.” – Kevin Williamson

{/for}

{for=”San Francisco Chronicle” value=”8″}

The Dark Knight is by no means a complete success. But the more it reveals its dark heart, the better it gets, and at times it seems just a step away from achieving something extraordinary. In the end, it’s no leap forward, but it’s certainly a step in the right direction.” – Mick LaSalle

{/for}

{for=”USA Today” value=”10″}

“A more thrilling, intelligent, morally complex and masterfully crafted film than any summer blockbuster in recent years. It’s probably the best superhero movie to date.” – Claudia Puig

{/for}

{for=”Los Angeles Times” value=”9″}

The Dark Knight may be the most hopeless, despairing comic-book movie in memory. It creates a world where being a superhero is at best a double-edged sword and no triumph is likely to be anything but short-lived.” – Kenneth Turan

{/for}

{for=”Chicago Tribune” value=”10″}

“Sensational, grandly sinister and not for the kids, “The Dark Knight” elevates pulp to a very high level.” – Michael Phillips

{/for}

{/rw_score} –>

July 11th, 2008

Review of Reviews: Critics say don’t bother to Meet Dave

Opens: July 11, 2008
Rated: PG (Mild slapstick violence, potty humor, adult language, sexually suggestive humor)
Genres: Science Fiction, Comedy

After his Oscar nomination for best supporting actor in the 2006 Dreamgirls, movie critics expect more out of Eddie Murphy.

But he seems content to make slapstick gross-out comedies aimed at the 10-to-13-year old market (and those who laugh like pre-teens).

His latest movie, Meet Dave (previously called Starship Dave before some P.R.-type decided to de-sci-fi the title), has Murphy returning to comedic science fiction.

His last outing in the genre was 2002′s The Adventures of Pluto Nash which was a box office failure, but has gained a cult following due to its campy nature.

Meet Dave has Murphy teamed with Norbit director Brian Robbins (a former child actor and teen heartthrob in the 1986-1991 series, Head of the Class, who grew up to be an executive producer of Smallville).

Judging from the reviews, most mainstream film critics are not fans of the Murphy-Robbins duo. And if they have to choose a target of their venom – it more often than not is aimed at Robbins.

Positive notes include kudos to Murphy’s mastery of subtle characterization mixed with the broad comedy of physical slapstick humor.

Negative comments include digs at a supposedly tired concept, overacting by everyone except Murphy and humor that may insult the intelligence of anyone past puberty.

WATCH THE TRAILER

<!– {rw_good}

  • Pre-teen family friendly if you don’t mind slightly naughty potty humor

{/rw_good} –>

<!– {rw_bad}

  • Overacting by most of the cast
  • Cited for poor direction
  • Plot runs thin

{/rw_bad} –>

<!– {rw_score}

{for="Los Angeles Times" value="3"}

"If Murphy seems to have learned something from the scathing reaction to the excessive and generally grotesque "Norbit," Brian Robbins, who directed that movie as well as this one, has not. As if to make up for Murphy's tightly controlled performance, the movie's other actors are pushed past the limits of parody. " – Sam Adams

{/for}

{for=”New York Times” value=”4″}

“The movie plays like a half-hour sitcom episode that has been stretched — principally through Mr. Murphy’s walking and talking — to feature-length running time.” – Manola Dargis

{/for}

{for=”Reuters” value=”4″}

“Like most of Murphy’s recent output, the movie aims low — as in, the targeted pint-sized audience — and its family-friendly results should translate into some solid summer numbers up on its Friday release.” – Michael Rechtshaffen

{/for}

{for=”Boston Herald” value=”2″}

“With toilet humor, such corny-as-Kansas lines as ‘How do you know when you feel love?’ and a too-predictable scenario that never lets Murphy do much more than mug, Meet Dave deserves a ‘no thanks.’” – Stephen Schaefer

{/for}

{for=”Orlando Sentinel” value=”6″}

“It says volumes about the state of Eddie Murphy’s comedy career that Meet Dave, his latest, is his least hateful film in years. For an actor known for making fun of gays, women, fat people, white people, gays, Asians and homosexuals, that’s saying something.” – Roger Moore

{/for}

{for=”San Francisco Chronicle” value=”7″}

His new comedy, Meet Dave, isn’t likely to win Murphy another Oscar nomination. But at least it allows him to do what he does best – loads of physical comedy – and doesn’t rely principally on special effects for its humor.” – Ruthe Stein

{/for}

{for=”Chicago Tribune” value=”5″}

Murphy as a brother from another planet inhabited by a team of little men and women supplying his every word and move, is its occasional funniness amid a sea of pablum. If it were completely rank, it’d be less frustrating.” – Michael Phillips

{/for}

{for=”Philadelphia Inquirer” value=”7″}

In Meet Dave, family-friendly as a Fourth of July picnic, Murphy and Norbit director Brian Robbins redeem themselves with a performance and scenario that might have been developed for Steve Martin.” – Carrie Rickey

{/for}

{/rw_score} –>

July 10th, 2008

Review of Reviews: Critics agree, Hellboy II is a red hot hit

OPENS: July 11, 2008
RATING: PG-13
GENRES: Dark Fantasy, Comedy, Steampunk
NO SPOILERS

Writer/director Guillermo del Toro (director of three-time Oscar-winner Pan’s Labyrinth as well as Blade II and the original Hellboy) is on a roll, according to mainstream movie critics, who hail him as everything from the next Hitchcock to the next Ovid.

Although not all the critics loved the film – almost 9 out of 10 gave it positive reviews – which is an accomplishment for a genre film since the mainstream press seems hellbent on dismissing anything with an out-of-this-world imagination.

Not so with Hellboy II: The Golden Army.

Critics universally praised del Toro for his unique visual style and ability to set a mood like not other directer working today. Also, the actor playing the title role, Ron Perlman (TV’s Beauty and the Beast) an unlikely action hero at age 58, was praised by most as being at the top of his game.

Of the few negative comments, some found fault with the story as too simplistic or unbelievable, as if they forgot they were watching a social commentary disguised as a horror comedy about a big red demon who cut off his horns, loves kittens and decided to fight for the good guys.

The absurdity of life is the message, guys.

Del Toro’s next films: Doctor Strange in 2010 and in 2012 – The Hobbit (official prequels to Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy)

WATCH THE TRAILER

<!– {rw_good}

  • Outstanding special effects
  • Great visuals in cinematography
  • Genuine chills – and laughs
  • Moody and original dark fantasy elements

{/rw_good} –>

<!– {rw_bad}

  • Action, violence and language may be too harsh for children.
  • A few critics found the plot too predictable.

{/rw_bad} –>

<!– {rw_score}

{for="Los Angeles Times" value="8"}

"Starting with characters created by Mike Mignola for Dark Horse Comics, writer-director Del Toro, whose one-of-a-kind Pan’s Labyrinth won a trio of Oscars in 2007, is almost alone in his ability to re-create on screen the wide-eyed exhilaration and disturbing grotesqueness that is the legacy of reading comics on the page.” – Kenneth Turan

{/for}

{for=”Seattle Post-Intelligencer” value=”8″}

“It definitely gives us our money’s worth in the sheer volume of its imaginative fantasy creatures and it’s that rare superhero-movie sequel that’s better than the original.” – William Arnold

{/for}

{for=”Slate” value=”8″}

“Mexican director Guillermo del Toro has started to look like a legitimate successor to Ovid. Del Toro is not so much a creator of myths as a collector of them, a transhistorical myth nerd whose pantheon of influences ranges from Hesiod to Harryhausen (with liberal helpings of steam punk and Catholic iconography).” – Dana Stevens 

{/for}

{for=”Kansas City Star” value=”6″}

“Here’s the problem: too much razzle-dazzle. Not enough Ron Perlman.” – Robert W. Butler 

{/for}

{for=”The Vancouver Sun” value=”9″}

“In a season of endless comic book superheroes, Hellboy II is a unique visual feast.” – Jay Stone

{/for}

{for=”Minneapolis Star-Tribune” value=”9″}

“Guillermo Del Toro’s stylish sense of wonderment makes for the best superhero movie of the summer. ” – Colin Covert

{/for}

{for=”Chicago Tribune” value=”7″}

“in the right hands, digital effects, creature design and directorial elan can work together to give you the best sort of willies.” – Michael Phillips

{/for}

{for=”Rotten Tomatoes” value=”9″}

Del Toro crafts a stellar comic book sequel, boasting visuals that are as imaginative as the characters are endearing.” Tomatometer

{/for}{/rw_score} –>

July 2nd, 2008

Review of Reviews: Is Hancock the most-hated blockbuster of 2008?

<!– {rw_text}

According to critics, it’s a toss-up between Hancock and Speed Racer for worst big-budget film of 2008.

{/rw_text} –>

OPENS: July 2, 2008
RATING: PG-13
NO SPOILERS

Will Smith has a new big-budget blockbuster film out this 4th of July weekend and most film critics hate it.

In Hancock, Smith stars alongside Jason Bateman (Juno) and Charlize Theron (Aeon Flux) in a film about the ultimate super anti-hero.

Of particular note is the phrase “Super Zero” that has shown up in many, many of this film’s negative reviews.

Of those who do not like Hancock, most took particular time to point out that the film contains gritty, realistic violence that normally is reserved for R-rated films.

Also noted as negatives were a haphazard script and a confusing and undeveloped plot.

Of the few who liked the film, Hancock was praised as being daringly original. Particular praise was given to the on-screen chemistry between Theron and Smith.

Watch the trailer: (Warning some minor spoilers)

A choice selection of Hancock film reviews follows:

<!– {rw_good}

  • Outstanding cast
  • Smith and Charlize Theron shine

{/rw_good} –>

<!– {rw_bad}

  • Level of bloody violence worse than you’d expect for a PG-13 film
  • Not recommended for children younger than 17.
  • Plot not cohesive.
  • Excessive foul language may be too much for some.

{/rw_bad} –>

<!– {rw_score}

{for="Minneapolis Star-Tribune" value="3"}

"Almost any moviegoer should be able to find something to enjoy, but it's hard to imagine anyone liking this mishmash from beginning to end."- Colin Covert

{/for}

{for="Bloomberg" value="5"}

"In this summer of superhero movies, Hancock stands out like a homeless beggar on a millionaire's yacht. " – Rick Warner

{/for}

{for="The New Yorker" value="9"}

"Hancock suggests new visual directions and emotional tonalities for pop. It’s by far the most enjoyable big movie of the summer.” – David Denby

{/for}

{for=”Washington Post” value=”5″}

Hancock is indigestible. It’s a movie with an identity crisis that seems to offer one gentle pleasure but instead offers a harsher experience by far. It’s very, very strange.” – Stephen Hunter

{/for}

{for=”CNN” value=”4″}

Hancock will likely post strong long weekend figures, but just watch those numbers plummet as the word gets out. A superhero can overcome many things, but not a movie that goes off the rails.” – Tom Charity

{/for}

{for=”San Francisco Chronicle” value=”5″}

“The movie feels trivial as an emotional piece and never takes off as an action movie. The special effects are ho-hum, and in the dramatic scenes, the actors seem to be feeling a lot more than the audience. That’s never a good sign.” – Mitch LaSalle

{/for}

{for=”NPR” value=”4″}

“It has to be emphasized that though the film’s trailers carefully hide it, Hancock has a blisteringly profane tongue. How diatribes that would make a stevedore blush got a PG-13 rating is a question for another day.” – Kenneth Turan

{/for}

{for=”Boston Globe” value=”3″}

“Yet once the vulgar comedy dissipates, we’re left with poorly photographed, bullet-riddled summer-action mayhem. The only thing drunker than Hancock is the editing and camerawork.” – Wesley Morris

{/for}

{for=”USA Today” value=”5″}

“What starts out with a sense of quirky fun loses direction and devolves into a mishmash of story lines. The finished product is so poorly conceived and misguided that even Will Smith, with all his charm, can’t save it.” – Claudia Puig

{/for}

{for=”Chicago Tribune” value=”3″}

“It depresses me to think of all the preteens who’ll be sitting through this, since it squeaked by with a PG-13 rating; the violence and the general abrasiveness are a genuine drag.” – Michael Phillips

{/for}

{for=”Cinematical” value=”8″}

“one of the weirdest studio movies in some time, and not one without precedent. Superhero satires tend to get regarded as passable comedies, but they’re often loaded with pertinent social commentary. As long as America continues to obsess over good guys in funny costumes, there’s a benefit to satirizing them: It helps us understand the mania. .” – Eric Kohn

{/for}

{/rw_score} –>

June 27th, 2008

Review of Reviews: Incredible Hulk

RATED: PG-13 | NO SPOILERS

Five years after Ang Lee’s disappointing Hulk, Marvel decided to reboot the comic hero with a new film, The Incredible Hulk, which picks up roughly where the 1970s-80s TV series left off; ignoring the 2003 film altogether.

The film also features fa nod to long-time Hulk fans with witty cameos of the stars from the TV series.

Mainstream critics had been lukewarm on the film, with the most scathing comments from those critics who are quick to pooh-pooh most genre films anyway.

But the consensus is that those who are looking for a great action film with killer CGI animation, this Hulk will not disappoint.

Also noted in most reviews is a stand-out performance by Oscar-winning actor, William Hurt – who make the most of his part of a military leader teetering on the edge between loyalty to his orders and loyalty to his conscience.

Some thought the message was a little too preachy and most found the end battle scene too predictable.

Below are selected reviews from prominent critics:

<!– {rw_good}

  • Outstanding Special Effects
  • Great Supporting Cast
  • Action packed

{/rw_good} –>

<!– {rw_bad}

  • Too Scary for Small Children
  • End is Predictable

{/rw_bad} –>

<!– {rw_score}

{for="National Post – Canada" value="5"}

"For all its ground-shaking, the final battle amounts to no more than a pause between the creation story we have just witnessed and the inevitable sequel." – Chris Knight

{/for}

{for="Christian Science Monitor" value="6"}

"Now that we've demonstrated that comic book icons can look like you and me, how about we go back to the Christopher Reeve era when they looked like square-jawed movie stars?" – Peter Rainer

{/for}

{for="CNN" value="7"}

"The climax is a bit of a yawn — it boils down to two big apes slugging it out with an entirely predictable outcome — but most of what precedes it is vigorous and sharp." – Tom Charity

{/for}

{for="Washington Post" value="7"}

"There are sequences that are genuinely beautiful, especially the scenes shot in the Brazilian favela, with its rich visual textures and evocative roofscapes." – Ann Hornaday

{/for}

{for="San Jose Mercury News" value="8"}

" The Incredible Hulk has a few annoying flaws, but it’s gratifying in many of the ways a Marvel Comics movie should be.” – Bob Straus

{/for}

{for=”New York TImes” value=”6″}

The Adequate Hulk would have been a more suitable title.” – A.O. Scott

{/for}

{for=”Chcago Tribune” value=”7″}

The Incredible Hulk keeps slamming everything forward, satisfyingly.” – Michael Phillips

{/for}

{for=”Entertainment Weekly” value=”7″}

“The audience, in all likelihood, will be so grateful not to see another joyless, inert, pea green dud that it may not mind that The Incredible Hulk is just a luridly reductive and violent B movie — one that clears a bar that hadn’t been set very high.” – Owen Gleiberman

{/for}

{for=”USA Today” value=”6″}

“The saga is uneven and there are plot holes, but as a popcorn movie steeped in action, it keeps our attention.” – Claudia Puig

{/for}

{/rw_score} –>

August 23rd, 2007

Video: ‘Stardust’ review

CBC takes a look at Stardust.

January 2nd, 2006

Top 10 most popular FanDominion stories

Here are the Top 10 most-visited FanDominion pages for 2005:
(Excluding index pages)

  1. Narnia fans: Recipe for authentic Turkish Delight
  2. ABC’s cancelled ‘Nightstalker’ finds new life on Sci Fi Fridays
  3. Most-Successful Sci Fi and Fantasy Movies of 2005 (so far)
  4. Sci Fi adds “John Doe” to Sci Fi Friday starting Jan. 20
  5. Disney angers fans as it “kills off” Christopher Robin
  6. Sci Fi picks up rights to campy NBC soap opera
  7. Axe falls on ‘Nightstalker,’ ABC not to air end of cliffhanger
  8. Film Review: Swinton’s White Witch saves Narnia flick from Disney mediocrity mill
  9. NBC plans time travel adventure series ‘Pen and the Sword’
  10. Lost, Narnia, Medium and Kong garner Golden Globe nods